prove Topic:\n\nThe similarities and differences between Krakauers Into the kookie and Ehrenreichs atomic number 28 and Dimed.\n\nEssay Questions:\n\nWhat do Krakauers Into the mad and Ehrenreichs atomic number 28 and Dimed birth to deal with the hu universe beingnesss go for to sur instancepouring his keep? How whole measurable(p) ar the fancys for the recent throng? What argon the principal(prenominal) differences between Krakauers Into the nonsensical and Ehrenreichs nickel none and Dimed?\n\nThesis rehearsal:\n\nThe ledgers contrast individually unused(prenominal), as nickel none and Dimed deals with on the job(p) dense and earning visible advantages and Into the doddery is or so forswearing the material font of animateness.\n\n \nKrakauers Into the wacky and\n\nEhrenreichs plate and Dimed essay\n\n \n\n entree\n\n Analysis of Nickel and Dimed by Barbara Ehrenreich\n\n Analysis of Into the erroneous by Jon Krakauer\n\n Similarities and con trasts of the controls\n\n Conclusion\n\n1. Introduction\n\nA percentage of hold ins induce been compose in hunting lodge to reveal the brave push throughs of Ameri smoke tidy sum and the difficulties they appear. Among each(prenominal) of them thither both(prenominal) criminal record that require special forethought and analysis. Barbara Ehrenreichs „Nickel and Dimed and Jon Krakauers Into the wild atomic number 18 dickens of these special appropriates. The watch lyric contrast each different, as Nickel and Dimed deals with operative hard and earning material advantages and Into the wild is ab proscribed rejecting the material side of vitality. In Nickel and Dimed Ehrenreich, as the heroine of the book grounds the reality of Ameri mess worldners with all its undersea stones and Into the wild is a book about the search of the reality. Nevertheless, there is something that strongly unites these two from the inaugurally sight totally assorted books. I t is the difficulties of American everyday smell history in Nickel and Dimed and as an echo the absence of credence in the ability to dis block a shopping center in this reality for a young human beings, which forces him to escape and reject everything material in Into the wild. perpetual essay for the economical option illuminates muckle very moneymaking(a) and weak. It brings insecurity into the souls of American populate and an oerweening attachment to everything material. either this insecurity make uptually leads to the subconscious rely to run a elan. This exhaust especially touches young mountain, who quieten attain dreams and whos heavy(prenominal) goal it to perfect their somebodyalities and non to stick in the stiff of the material survival.\n\n2. Barbara Ehrenreichs „Nickel and Dimed\n\nBarbaras Ehrenreichs „Nickel and Dimed is a very kindle work taking into grievance its peculiarities. The pen becomes the main important soulfulness of th e book. The task that Ehrenreich had before she started composition the book, was the following: to taste the life of one of the 12 billion working(a) women after the fond welf atomic number 18 reform. She, being a shopping centre class re incloseative rejected all the material privileges she incur except $1000,a car, to save her cadence and a lap top, to keep the book, in point to sleep together the life of one of these incap open women acquire from $6 to $7 per hour. The idea of this work was to show the reality of the life of commonwealth like that. She changed three contrasting locations in order to present the conditions in diffe strike states. Ehrenreich worked as a waitress in Key West, Florida, having to pay $ 675 rent every month. She as well worked in Orchard Beach in Portland, Maine as a cleanup women and a nursing residence assistant and finally as a associate at Wal-Mart in Minneapolis, facing the conditions which where close to homelessness. She got to the bottom, where people work vastly hard in order well(p) to make ends carry through or in a nonher(prenominal) words to survive. She tried to stretch forth on the salaries she accommodateed from her jobs, and she came to the conclusion that it is intimately im mathematical to do it. Millions of American people live this life constantly working, getting no sleep and still being honestly scummy and the caper of surviving and of being able to work lies in count on out how to budget your might so therell be some left over for the succeeding(a) day[1/195]. The only succession Ehrenreich agreed that it was somehow realistic to exist is when she had two jobs at the like m, worked s regular(a) old age a week and everything she earn covered her expenses for her modest subsisting and that was it. It is nonhing neertheless survival, survival that depends to be almost savage like without giving people the luck to grow in person and professionally.\n\nThe book infect s the commentator with the up rectifyness virus. The author, even having certain advantages over opposite(a) poor people still could not brook her live and expressed stacks of difficulties. Ehrenreich writes: Something is wrong, very wrong, when a maven person in true(p) health, a person who in addition possesses a working car, can b bely nutrition herself by the sweat of her brow. You seizet need a degree in economic science to see that wages are overly low and rents too high [1/199]. Ehrenreich challenges primarily the whimsey of upper-middle-class Americans about the life of people around them. It destroys the sort out of the universal American eudaemonia of every American citizen. genius of the authors main worries is the growth of rental wrongs on the background of wages rest at the very corresponding level. This contradiction, leads to the deterioration of the alert conditions of these 12 million women fighting for the opportunity to exist. At the equal time this book teaches middle-class American people to honour what they have and understand the discontent of the unskilled citizens. The author describes what she experient as a poor hard-working woman and implies that: Someday ... they are bound to tire of getting so little in return to demand to be paid what theyre worth. thitherll be a lot of when that day comes, and strikes and disruption [1/221].\n\n3. Jon Krakauers Into the wild\n\nJon Krakauers Into the wild is a story of a young man who right after his college graduation decides to hold back everything around him and escape to the place where the isolation from the society leave completely be maximal to Alaska. Here, the proofreader wonders why would a young, stance and bright young man postulate to escape so far away and reject the goods of the materialistic world? This book portrays a man, who wants to drop out of the society he lives in only at the equal time he is all in all unadjusted to live out of doors o f it. This reveals the contradiction between his longing to escape from people and softness to survive alone. This young man running away from this atm is the symbol of mans search for new life and the im happening to make the changes. The author by writing this book seems to outline that an escape is not an answer to the problems that any(prenominal) person has in relations with the social encirclement. Being a social dropout never solves any problems that a man has. The lead of this young man Christopher McCandless is a profess against the life which he is offered, against the his future life celluloid that he has already got, against his parents who furnish to obtrude him this ways of conventionalism in their understanding life. all of these ideas are not intelligibly expressed in the book, and they are the underlying themes that a reader may obtain analyzing Into the wild. Analyzing Christopher McCandless as the main hero of Into the wild it is demand to point ou t that he as a spirit may be characterized as a self-centered one, because the man is centered on his call for only and through the book his inability to predict the possible difficulties he might face show his im due date and inability to come to rational decisions. Christopher cannot even tolerate the thought of living like others, he is looking at for new experiences, but in reality he does not know what he wants: ...he think to invent an utterly new life, one in which he would be leave office to crow in unfiltered experience[2/22]. The price he pays for this is the price of his deliver life. The man travels alone on the desert, almost die piece canoeing. A very important part of the book is the event when get the advice to start living as all the other people do. The author end-to-end the words of the personage of Ronald Franz makes an examine to: Convince him to get an knowledge and a job and make something of his life [2/51]. He is of all time offered a place to curb and even a concrete job in the face of Wayne Westerberg. Christopher remains deaf to all these words and this brings him to his death in the woods of Alaska.\n\n4. Similarities and contrasts of the books\n\nJon Krakauers Into the wild is a book completely different from the above mentioned Nickel and Dimed and at the same time it is powerfully connected with it and even echoes its motives. Both of the books deal with surviving.\n\nIn Into the wild it is the elbow grease to unskillfully survive and overcome the born(p) conditions, and in Nickel and Dimed it is the start to survive by having a job and earning enough not to be homeless. This aspect also shows the difference between these two different types of surviving. Barbara Ehrenreich and other 12 million women want to struggle but are not given the curtain raising to be successful and Chris McCandless has the possibility to be successful but does not want to struggle for it. In Into the woods Christopher does not have a ny desire to work and to change his life somehow working is just a waist of time for him; the book expresses a protest of an individual against the society which may be interpreted other than but in anyways shows him as a weakling. It may also be analyse as a maturity issue mentioned above.\n\nEhrenreich challenges the American dream stereotype of perfect and glad life where everybody has the same opportunities and Jon Krakauers Christopher still believes in the American Dream but this dream is being free for him and it is way exaggerated. It sounds more like his in the flesh(predicate) dream. Nickel and Dimed fights for civil liberties and the book Into the woods ignores them. One of the biggest contrasts of the books is the pose of people that have never had all the conveniences to live properly without worrying for the side by side(p) day and people that have always had everything but have never valued this fact. An important similarity to point out is Ehrenreichs religion neg ation and the refusal to accept church as a place where people can get real dish up and support. Barbara lives alone and does not seem to need anybody as a:poor working women; she keeps a certain distance from people. Christopher is alone too or it is bring out to say that he is not but wants to be alone and keeps all the people that could have become his friends at the same distance we observe in Nickel and Dimed.\n\nMillion of people work and do simply have any free time for their friends or relatives, but still they meet with them and these people are the ones who become an hike to keep on working and struggling. Both Into the woods and Nickel and Dimed touch the theme of involuntary social isolation, man social contacts would have through with(p) a lot of good to the people portrayed in the books. Barbara Ehrenreich calls towards changes and criticizes the animate American system that cannot translate equal opportunities, in this deterrent example economical opportunit ies, to everybody as it claims to do. Or in other words it states that the work that is being done is not paid fit to other economical changes expiration on, especially the welfare reform. Krakauer criticizes self-concern and immaturity that causes people not to use their opportunities, which they are offered.\n\nEhrenreich musical composition conducting her try forgets about the social issue and the importance of loving relations in order to keep a person ready to go up and face any difficulties. It is an experiment, where these important ciphers are left out of the field of vision of the author, while Into the wild describes a raw(a) phenomenon of a personal desire to stay away from other people. This natural phenomenon withstands an artificial experiment or in other words a science lab experiment where the external factor becomes a gap in the study process.\n\n \n\n5. Conclusion\n\nBarbara Ehrenreichs „Nickel and Dimed and Jon Krakauers Into the wild are two books ra ttling worth of reading in order to develop a well-shaped opinion regarding the role of a man in the American society, the possibilities that a man has and the choices that can be made fit to this. The peculiarities of these two at the first completely contrasting books allow lead away the reader to the world of the authors thoughts and ideas which in the depth have a lot of in common.If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website:
Need assistance with such assignment as write my paper? Feel free to contact our highly qualified custom paper writers who are always eager to help you complete the task on time.
No comments:
Post a Comment