Foreign Players in English Football

On 30 December 2009, the Barclays postmortem examination League football game match between Arsenal and Portsmouth made position football history as the number one match non to admit any British players. Arsenals team of multi- one million million pound outside stars won the game comfortably, 4-1 some would argue this is all that matters, but those who atomic number 18 passionate about football the real connoisseurs of the face game entrust recognize a deep underlying issue. Modern day football is unrecognizable compared to what has preceded it.In times past, teams were fashioned by nurturing youngish home-grown talents and bolstering the police squad with a few lads from Scotland and Ireland. Now the common consensus is that to achieve any triumph it is necessary to catch the attention of an exceedingly wealthy oil business withdrawer who will buy the club and proceed to spend ? 200 million a year on overpriced talent from the four corners of the world. This ethos is destroying British football. For example in the autopsy League there are 337 registered opposed players representing a total of 66 different countries.That equates to an average of 17 conflicting players per squad the averages in Italy, France and Spain are all around 10. On the first day of the inaugural post-mortem League season in 1992 fairish 22 non-British players snuff ited on the first day of this season 124 started. It isnt effective that triumph should be based on finance, is it? In 2004 Russian billionaire Roman Abramovich bought Chelsea F. C. , a team which hadnt won the league since 1954. He splosh an extravagant amount of money on the creme de la creme of distant talent from around the globe.Three seasons later they experienced unprecedented success which, would never apply happened without the cash injection. However, it was all achieved with just three regularly playing British players, who only made the squad because they were exceptional talents whic h money could non replace. This suffice a new benchmark for all the top teams in the land, devising a clear statement that if they wanted to match Chelseas success they would have to match Chelseas spending and chip in their home-grown players or put on the line being left behind.In 1995 the British transfer character was ? 7,000,000 by 2006 the record had sharply risen to ? 30,800,000, and player wages were spiralling out of control. It is true that this has lead to stronger squads, and the Premier League being viewed as the strongest league in the World, with self-consistent success in Europe, but can it be right to sacrifice our own players for this success? I think not. Journalists, pundits and just about each football fan in England have formed their own theories concerning Englands miserable failure at the 2010 World transfuse in southern Africa.Many causes have been suggested, yet to me the reason is obvious. If one analyses the teams which were some successful in South Africa, a definite trend appears. Spain won the World Cup this year. Many argue that they reached the final against Holland mainly because 77. 1% of footballers in their domestic help league are qualified to play for the national team, a civilize result of home-grown players being given the opportunity in their clubs first teams. In the Premier League fewer than 40% of players are English. Jose Luis Astiazaran, president of the Spanish Football League, said. Our strategy is to work very hard with young home-grown players and to seek to have a mix between them and experienced players we invest to a greater extentand more in young Spanish players than in young foreign players. England hasmany times taken young players from outside these kinds of players are not English. This is one of the most important differences between Spain and England. We invest inyoung Spanish players maybe this is why at the moment you are not creating young English players. One view is that foreign players benefit the English players, who apparently perform better alongside the Worlds best. I think dont you? that if more money, time, and attention were put into cultivating the copiousness of young English talent, the English players themselves would be the worlds best. The Premier League have recognised this, and this year the F. A. implemented new squad rules controlling the number of foreign players in each squad. This is a start towards reducing the amount of foreign players in the league, but the rules are likewise loose and easy to circumvent. Foreign players can be bought in from a young age and developed in the academies this means the young Englishmen unchanging dont get the attention they crave in instal to advance their careers.In my opinion the influx of foreign players in England is the single most detrimental factor in the game, leading to over-inflated transfer fees, increase in ticket prices, under development of home-grown players and ultimately the destru ction of the national team. The Premier League must review its policies, and clubs must invest in their academies or English national football will continue to deteriorate thoroughly into the future, and so many young aspiring footballers will be roster aside, and I for one cannot see that happen to the sport I and so many other Brits love.